divorcefinancetoolkit.co.uk Report : Visit Site

Technical data of the divorcefinancetoolkit.co.uk

Geo IP provides you such as latitude, longitude and ISP (Internet Service Provider) etc. informations. Our GeoIP service found where is host divorcefinancetoolkit.co.uk. Currently, hosted in Singapore and its service provider is CloudFlare Inc. .

HTTP Header Analysis

HTTP Header information is a part of HTTP protocol that a user's browser sends to called cloudflare containing the details of what the browser wants and will accept back from the web server.

DNS

HtmlToText

-- divorce finance toolkit the inside track for those struggling with divorce finance issues. home about child maintenance calculator legal lexicon online resources form e divorce contact subscribe to feed how much child maintenance should i pay? may 3, 2016 in child maintenance , technology by alan larkin | no comments two kids x 20% gross income, err, less pension payments, and then, erm, divided by 3 nights equals… damn. start again. two years ago i launched a child maintenance calculator to deal with the vexed question: “how much child maintenance should i pay?” the reasons i took the time out to develop this free tool are set out here . it’s fair to say i had the hump with the child maintenance service, on behalf of parents struggling with the issue of child maintenance, at the poorly executed calculator provided by that organisation. i am not able to spend as much time on this blog as i used to; i felt some years ago that my spare time had to benefit as many people as possible and that i should concentrate my efforts on a more ambitious way to help people connect with specialist family law advice. i put it all down to a numbers game . i have been very busy with those long-term plans aimed, a wee bit ambitiously, at bringing family law into the 21st century . so, being distracted by grander plans, i was pleasantly surprised to see that there have been 900 calculations using my child maintenance calculator. most of the calculations were carried out by private individuals, but with a sizeable number generated by lawyers, mediators and some advice agencies. i will continue to host and maintain the calculator as long as it meets a need. tags: calculators , child support , csa my ex is cohabiting january 25, 2016 in spousal maintenance by alan larkin | no comments my virtual postbag has another enquiry regarding an ex-partner who is now cohabiting: mp tells me: we are about to sign the paperwork regarding our financial settlement but my ex husband is lying about the fact he is cohabiting… does that make a difference for me as far as the financial settlement? i receive a great deal of traffic about the effect of cohabitation in the context of divorce financial settlement . i probably don’t have a lot more to say on the issue here except that this enquiry is interesting in respect of the obligation on each party to a divorce to tell the truth about their financial circumstances. that obligation to be full and frank about any change in relevant circumstances carries on until the point an order is approved and sealed by the family court. mp feels certain that her ex husband is lying about the fact he is cohabiting and asks whether this makes a difference as regards the financial settlement. i can’t really answer that question as i don’t know the circumstances. but i can say that mp’s ex needs to tell the truth about his circumstances because mp may feel that her ex’s new partner has a reasonable amount of income and can share expenses with the ex. in other words, this new partner represents an income resource to this ex. that may be relevant to mp’s circumstances if she is in need of spousal maintenance from her ex. if mp has lawyers then they can advise her upon the situation. from the sound of it, mp is about sign ‘the paperwork’ on her financial settlement. this sounds like a consent order. any consent order needs to be submitted to the family court for approval and be accompanied by a form d81 – also known as a statement of information form. one of the questions on the form requires a declaration as to whether either party is cohabiting or intends to cohabit. mp’s ex, when he signs this d81, must tell the truth. his lawyers, if he has them, must ensure that he understands his obligations in this regard. it is open to mp, if she feels strongly about this point, to refuse to sign the consent order or the d81 form until her ex provides a truthful response. she will need to be guided by her lawyers. tags: cohabitation , disclosure , spousal periodical payments faulty online divorce form e january 21, 2016 in form e , legal services , self-representation , uncategorized by alan larkin | no comments as we discovered just before christmas, the online divorce form e provided on the court website was faulty . it appears a section of the form which summarises, amongst other things, the capital and income of divorcing couples, failed to carry forward the liabilities from an earlier section. the result was that the net capital values produced in the summary section may have been falsely inflated by missing out any liabilities. the person who claims to have noticed the error (a self-styled family expert) used the publicity to criticise solicitors, barristers and judges for not having noticed it themselves. this fed into the usual lawyer-bashing on public forums and comment pages. most family lawyers were taken aback by this particular slew of criticism because: it is the court service’s form, so nothing to do with lawyers; 99% of family lawyers don’t use the court’s online form e as we pay to have our own software; family lawyers pay no attention to the summary page of the form e anyway as it is not helpfully laid out and does little to aid understanding; the form e financial information is quickly superceded by later rounds of financial disclosure any way; family lawyers tend to reproduce the form e information in separate excel spread sheets (to model likely settlement options) so any error would be quickly spotted. in short, although i have not been slow to have a pop at my fellow lawyers on the pages of this blog, i did think this particular story, as a vehicle to slag off family lawyers, was a bum rap. the real story is that lips have been let down. these people, the vast majority of this blog’s readership, cannot afford legal advice or struggle to maintain paid legal representation. i’m guessing it would be lips in the main who would have been using the court service online form e. i mean: it’s there to use, it’s free, and it’s on the official court website, so it must be safe to use, right? right? the minister responsible issued a statement to parliament: “ update on investigation into faulty online form used in divorce proceedings” . we now know the number of people likely to have been affected: “ a total of 36,527 cases contain a version of form e filed from these periods. hmcts staff have now reviewed all these cases and found that 3,638 files – 10% – contained the faulty calculator version of form e with an incorrect figure for net assets figure in the summary table. 1,403 of these cases are still live, allowing hmcts to intervene immediately to clearly flag these cases to the courts in order to avoid the error affecting the final orders in these cases. the remaining 2,235 files – 6.1% – were closed cases….i have instructed hmcts to write to all parties in the 2,235 closed cases. the letter expresses our sincere regret for the error, sets out what happened and explains that, although form e is just one part of the evidence used in their case, there remains a possibility that the error affected the final outcome.” if you are one of the people with a closed case receiving a letter from the court service you will need to work out whether you may have been prejudiced by the software error. apparently, the letter sets out the options available for those parties who think they have been adversely affected, which includes seeking to set aside any final order made or varying such an order. the letter also contains a link to a specific court form to be used by those who wish to set aside or vary their settlements. if anyone has received such a letter or has the link i would be happy to post a copy (suitably anonymised) on this blog. if there is anyone out there who thinks they are affected but has not yet contacted the court to register their concerns then please use the specially designated email address: [email protected] . only 51 people have done so as at

URL analysis for divorcefinancetoolkit.co.uk

https://www.divorcefinancetoolkit.co.uk/wp-content/uploads/screenshot6-e1408224368758.png
https://www.divorcefinancetoolkit.co.uk/2014/05/child-maintenance-charges/#respond
https://www.divorcefinancetoolkit.co.uk/tag/inheritance-act/
https://www.divorcefinancetoolkit.co.uk/2014/08/child-maintenance-and-cohabitation-should-not-be-linked/#respond
https://www.divorcefinancetoolkit.co.uk/2016/01/my-ex-is-cohabiting/
https://www.divorcefinancetoolkit.co.uk/tag/independent-financial-adviser/
https://www.divorcefinancetoolkit.co.uk/category/social-policy/
https://www.divorcefinancetoolkit.co.uk/2016/05/how-much-child-maintenance-should-i-pay/
https://www.divorcefinancetoolkit.co.uk/tag/arbitration/
https://www.divorcefinancetoolkit.co.uk/category/form-e/
https://www.divorcefinancetoolkit.co.uk/tag/companies-2/
https://www.divorcefinancetoolkit.co.uk/2013/03/how-does-the-budget-2013-impact-on-divorce-and-separation/
https://www.divorcefinancetoolkit.co.uk/tag/form-e1/
https://www.divorcefinancetoolkit.co.uk/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#ddbbb2afb0989db5b0bea9aef3baaeb4f3bab2abf3a8b6
https://www.divorcefinancetoolkit.co.uk/category/variation-maintenance/
gov.uk
familylawfinancialplanning.co.uk
familylawpartners.co.uk
siaro.co.uk
ifla.org.uk

Whois Information

Whois is a protocol that is access to registering information. You can reach when the website was registered, when it will be expire, what is contact details of the site with the following informations. In a nutshell, it includes these informations;

Domain name:
divorcefinancetoolkit.co.uk

Registrant:
Alan Larkin

Registrant type:
UK Individual

Registrant's address:
The registrant is a non-trading individual who has opted to have their
address omitted from the WHOIS service.

Data validation:
Nominet was able to match the registrant's name and address against a 3rd party data source on 16-Jul-2014

Registrar:
UK2 Limited [Tag = UK2NET]
URL: http://uk2.net

Relevant dates:
Registered on: 25-Jul-2010
Expiry date: 25-Jul-2018
Last updated: 24-Jul-2017

Registration status:
Registered until expiry date.

Name servers:
clark.ns.cloudflare.com
diva.ns.cloudflare.com

WHOIS lookup made at 05:53:17 07-Sep-2017

--
This WHOIS information is provided for free by Nominet UK the central registry
for .uk domain names. This information and the .uk WHOIS are:

Copyright Nominet UK 1996 - 2017.

You may not access the .uk WHOIS or use any data from it except as permitted
by the terms of use available in full at http://www.nominet.uk/whoisterms,
which includes restrictions on: (A) use of the data for advertising, or its
repackaging, recompilation, redistribution or reuse (B) obscuring, removing
or hiding any or all of this notice and (C) exceeding query rate or volume
limits. The data is provided on an 'as-is' basis and may lag behind the
register. Access may be withdrawn or restricted at any time.

  REFERRER http://www.nominet.org.uk

  REGISTRAR Nominet UK

SERVERS

  SERVER co.uk.whois-servers.net

  ARGS divorcefinancetoolkit.co.uk

  PORT 43

  TYPE domain

OWNER

  ORGANIZATION Alan Larkin

TYPE
UK Individual

ADDRESS
The registrant is a non-trading individual who has opted to have their
address omitted from the WHOIS service.
Data validation:
Nominet was able to match the registrant's name and address against a 3rd party data source on 16-Jul-2014

DOMAIN

  SPONSOR UK2 Limited [Tag = UK2NET]

  CREATED 2010-07-25

  CHANGED 2017-07-24

STATUS
Registered until expiry date.

NSERVER

  CLARK.NS.CLOUDFLARE.COM 173.245.59.87

  DIVA.NS.CLOUDFLARE.COM 173.245.58.97

  NAME divorcefinancetoolkit.co.uk

DISCLAIMER
This WHOIS information is provided for free by Nominet UK the central registry
for .uk domain names. This information and the .uk WHOIS are:
Copyright Nominet UK 1996 - 2017.
You may not access the .uk WHOIS or use any data from it except as permitted
by the terms of use available in full at http://www.nominet.uk/whoisterms,
which includes restrictions on: (A) use of the data for advertising, or its
repackaging, recompilation, redistribution or reuse (B) obscuring, removing
or hiding any or all of this notice and (C) exceeding query rate or volume
limits. The data is provided on an 'as-is' basis and may lag behind the
register. Access may be withdrawn or restricted at any time.

  REGISTERED yes

Mistakes

The following list shows you to spelling mistakes possible of the internet users for the website searched .